Knowledge · Sourcing

OEM battery RFQ guide

A complete RFQ gets you comparable quotes; a vague one gets you a range so wide it is useless. The template below is four blocks and at least fifteen fields — and three of those fields are where almost every failed RFQ goes wrong.

Short answer: Most OEM battery RFQs fail on three missing fields — the CCA test basis, the annual volume, and one standard per line. A complete RFQ carries at least 15 fields across four blocks (specification, volume, branding, commercial), one model per line, so every supplier quotes the same scope and the prices become comparable.

The specification block

The volume block

The branding block

The commercial block

Send an OEM battery RFQ → · Build a clean specification →

The three missing fields that fail an RFQ

Every one of these turns a quote into a guess, and a guess into a range wide enough to be useless:

  1. CCA test basis — JIS (−15°C) and EN/SAE (−18°C) are different tests. Without the basis, two suppliers quote two different measurements and you compare them anyway.
  2. Annual volume — MOQ and tiered pricing depend on it. A missing volume makes every supplier assume its own worst case, and the tier you land in is a lottery.
  3. One standard per line — mixing JIS and DIN models in a single line forces the supplier to guess which case and which CCA method you mean. One model, one line, one scope.

RFQ field checklist

A single missing field is usually what turns a quote into a guess. Work through this table before sending.

BlockFieldWhy it matters
SpecificationStandard family + reference modelJIS, DIN and BCI cases are not interchangeable; the model anchors the case size.
SpecificationCCA test basisJIS (−15°C) and EN/SAE (−18°C) are different tests; without the basis, two quotes are not comparable.
SpecificationTerminal type & polarityTerminal layout decides whether the battery physically fits the vehicle.
VolumeAnnual volume + first orderMOQ and tiered pricing depend on it; a missing volume makes the supplier assume the worst case.
VolumeTarget marketThe market decides the standard family and the certification set.
BrandingLabel + packaging + documentationPrivate-label scope changes tooling and lead time.
CommercialIncoterms + paymentFOB, CFR and CIF move cost and risk differently between buyer and supplier.

Do not put a price target in a first RFQ unless you want suppliers to quote to the number rather than the scope. Quote on scope first; negotiate price second.

Compare quotes on scope, not price

When quotes come back, check six things before comparing the unit number:

The quote-comparison table

Put every returned quote into one table before you rank anything. The rows are the six scope fields; the columns are the suppliers. A cell that is empty is a quote you cannot compare — go back and ask, rather than averaging around it.

Scope fieldSupplier ASupplier BSupplier C
Standard + case referenceJIS D26JIS D26“similar”
CCA basisJIS −15°CJIS −15°Cnot stated
MOQ tier1 × 20ft1 × 20ft5,000 units
ToolingIncludedCharged separatelyIncluded
IncotermFOB TianjinFOB TianjinCIF
Warranty12 mo, narrow exclusions12 mo, broad exclusions12 mo, not written

In this example, Supplier C is uncomparable on three of six fields — the cheapest unit price there tells you nothing. Only Suppliers A and B are comparable, and between them the warranty scope is the deciding difference. This is the whole discipline: normalise the scope, then let price rank.

Why most RFQs fail

Compare returned quotes only after fixing those fields. Start with the specification guide and keep one model per line item. Dingwei Battery provides OEM and private-label battery programs manufactured by Chengguang Power Tech Co., Ltd. (founded 2002).

The RFQ is stage five of the sourcing guide — run it after you have verified and audited the candidates, so the shortlist you send it to is already credible.

A printable RFQ template

Here is the full template with example values filled in, so you can see what a complete RFQ looks like before you adapt it:

FieldExample value
Battery typeSLI (maintenance-free)
Standard familyJIS
Reference model80D26L
Voltage12 V
Capacity68 Ah at C20
CCA + test basis490 A (JIS −15°C)
Case size / terminal / polarityD26 / top post / L
Annual volume24,000 units (2,000/month)
First order1 × 20ft container
Target marketMiddle East (GCC)
BrandingPrivate label, English + Arabic label
PackagingIndividual carton, palletised, export grade
IncotermsFOB Tianjin
PaymentT/T 30/70 or L/C at sight
DeliveryWithin 45 days of deposit
Required certificatesSASO conformity + IATF 16949 + ISO 9001

Sixteen fields, one scope. Every field you delete is a field the supplier will guess — and every guessed field widens the price range you get back.

Evaluate the responses, not just the numbers

When quotes return, score the response quality before you score the price:

Common supplier dodges in a quote

Watch for these three, which look like answers but are not:

  1. “Similar model available” — a different battery at a different price. Send it back.
  2. “Price valid for 7 days” — a pressure tactic to force a decision before you have compared scopes. Ignore the clock; lock the scope first.
  3. “Price depends on quantity” — true, but if they will not quote against the volume you gave, they are fishing for a bigger order.

The rule is simple: a quote you cannot place into the comparison table is a quote you cannot act on, regardless of how good the number looks.

The two references that make the RFQ precise

Two of the RFQ fields deserve an external reference, because they are where precision is usually lost:

An RFQ that cites the test standard and the Incoterm is an engineering document; one that does not is an invitation to quote three different scopes. The difference is the width of the price range you get back.

The Author's Take

Position: In my view, a complete RFQ gets you comparable quotes and a vague one gets you a range so wide it is useless — and three missing fields fail almost every RFQ.

Reasoning:

  • The CCA test basis, the annual volume and one standard per line are the fields that turn a quote into a guess.
  • Compare returned quotes on scope before price; a supplier uncomparable on three of six fields is telling you nothing, however cheap the number.
  • Do not put a price target in the first RFQ — suppliers quote to a number when you give them one, and scope should lead price.

Disclosure: this is the author's editorial judgment and field experience, not a verified technical claim.

Sources and further reading

Single model versus multi-model RFQs

If your program spans several models, the instinct is to put them all in one RFQ. Resist it. A single-model RFQ returns a clean, comparable quote; a multi-model RFQ returns a spreadsheet where each line was guessed on a slightly different assumption. The correct pattern is one RFQ per model, or one RFQ with one model per line — and if you must mix, state the standard family and CCA basis separately for every line. The extra RFQ cost is nothing compared with comparing quotes that are not actually comparable.

Frequently asked questions

Why do most RFQs fail?

3 missing fields: the CCA basis, the annual volume, and a single standard per line. A supplier can only quote accurately on 1 scope, not a vague one.

Should I include a target price in the RFQ?

Not in the first RFQ. Quote on scope first so you get honest engineering responses, then negotiate price once the 15-field scope is locked.

How many models should one RFQ line item cover?

1. Mixing JIS and DIN models in a single line forces the supplier to guess, and you get a range instead of a quote.

How many fields should a complete RFQ carry?

At least 15 fields across four blocks — specification, volume, branding and commercial. Missing the CCA basis, the annual volume or the per-line standard is what turns a quote into a guess.

Send a complete OEM RFQ

Tell us your specification, target market and annual volume. We will prepare an OEM or private-label program for review.

Request OEM Quote